--- Environment Canada signature Canada Wordmark
---
Français Contact Us Help Search Canada Site
What's New
About Us
Topics Publications Weather Home
---
 Ecological Monitoring and Assessment Network
Home
About EMAN
Research Network
Get Involved
What's New
Coming Events
EMAN Library
 - Publications
 - Newsletters
 - Meeting Summaries
 - Assessments
Monitoring Protocols
Data
Tools and Resources
National Science Meeting
NatureWatch
Canadian Community
Monitoring Network
Nearshore Marine
Site Map
Digital Postcards
Search
Contact Us
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 88   October-November 2003
List of papers 2003

Canadian environmental effects monitoring: experiences with pulp and paper and metal mining regulatory programs.

S. L. Walker*, S.C.. Ribey, l. Trudel, and E. Porter

National EEM Office, Environment Canada, 351 St. Joseph Blvd, Place Vincent Massey, 8th fl., Hull, Quebec, Canada, K1A 0H3

(*Author for correspondence: e-mail: sherry.walker@ec.gc.ca; Tel: (819) 953-1571)

Abstract
In Canada, Environmental Effects Monitoring (EEM) programs exist within two regulations: the Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations and the new Metal Mining Effluent Regulations under the Canadian Fisheries Act. EEM provides a biological, effects-based feedback loop to assess the effectiveness of technology-based regulations in protecting receiving environments. The promulgation of the Pulp and Paper Effluent Regulations, in 1992, represented a significant step forward in the Canadian regulatory approach by incorporating directly into a regulation a requirement to assess the effects of effluent discharges on receiving environments using proven scientific monitoring methodologies. Similarly, an assessment of the aquatic impacts of mines resulted in recommendations to amend the Metal Mining Effluent Regulations, recently promulgated in 2002, and includes an EEM program as a science-based feedback loop. As such, these regulations recognize the possibility that national, technology-based standards may not necessarily protect all receiving environments because of the diversity and variability of both discharges and receiving sites across the country. Since that time, EEM has improved its flexibility by considering both advances in science and the uniqueness of monitoring sites across Canada to allow the most appropriate and cost-effective monitoring approaches at each site while maintaining national consistency. This paper discusses the use of monitoring under two Canadian regulations to assess effects on aquatic ecosystems. As well, the National EEM approach to maintaining up-to-date scientific practices in a national regulatory program is discussed using examples.

Keywords
aquatic monitoring, metal mining, pulp and paper

Article ID: 5141345


previous page | table of contents | next page


| What's New | About Us | Topics | Publications | Weather | Home |
| Français | Contact Us | Help | Search | Canada Site |
Last Updated: 2003-11-27     Important Notices
URL of this page: http://www.eman-rese.ca/eman/reports/publications/2003_ema/page14.html